![\"No](\"https:\/\/static.toiimg.com\/thumb\/msid-130077663,imgsize-171096,width-400,height-225,resizemode-4\/no-personal-oral-hearing-needed-before-labelling-bank-accounts-as-fraud-sc.jpg\")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\nThe Supreme Court, on Tuesday, issued a decision regarding the classification of bank accounts as fraud. The apex court ordered that banks are not obligated to grant customers a personal oral hearing before declaring their accounts as fraud. However, prior to labelling them, banks must provide customers with a forensic audit report.The ruling follows submissions made earlier this year by the Reserve Bank of India<\/a> (RBI) and State Bank of India (SBI), which argued that conducting personal hearings in every case would not be feasible given the scale of fraud in the banking system.Earlier, appearing for SBI, solicitor general Tushar Mehta had told the court that the volume of fraud cases has risen sharply, making individual hearings difficult to implement. He said that introducing such a requirement could disrupt the process of identifying and declaring fraudulent accounts.The court was informed that around 60,000 instances of bank fraud were recorded over the past two financial years, involving Rs 48,244 crore. Breaking down the figures, Mehta said there were 36,060 cases in 2023\u201324 and 23,953 in 2024\u201325. The amount involved in 2024\u201325 stood at Rs 36,014 crore, reflecting a 194 per cent increase from Rs 12,230 crore in the previous year.A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and K V Viswanathan had earlier questioned the absence of personal hearings, noting that such a step is generally linked to principles of natural justice. In response, Mehta maintained that banks do not offer personal hearings in these situations, as it may defeat the purpose of the classification process. He added that there could also be circumstances where providing such hearings is not possible.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n