Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar and 4 others, including a twenty-five-year-old First Officer named Captain Shambhavi Pathak, died in an unfortunate plane crash<\/a><\/strong> in Baramati, Maharashtra. The immediate aftermath of this tragic incident was a sudden eruption of social media, not just with grief but with something far more sinister, mockery created out of someone\u2019s death. Comments that appeared to be referring to the male and female pilots aboard emerged across social media platforms, transforming a devastating tragedy into an occasion for gendered ridicule<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n This response demands interrogation not merely as an isolated act of cruelty, but as a mirror that reflects the face of structural violence against women who dare to claim space in professions that have long been defined by men. The response echoes Khaled Hosseini\u2019s famous line that \u201cA man\u2019s accusing finger always finds a woman<\/em>,\u201d revealing how gender becomes the quickest explanation when facts are inconvenient.<\/p>\n When a woman pilot dies in a crash, and the immediate response is to invoke her gender as explanation, we witness what Iris Marion Young calls \u2018Cultural Imperialism<\/a><\/strong>\u2018 in its rawest form as prejudice framed by dominant sections of the society turns into common sense. Captain Pathak is denied subjecthood as a trained professional with strong credentials as a commercial pilot. Instead, she becomes reducible to a single category, a woman. This cannot be termed as mere mockery, an accidental comment or a casual joke. The memefication might appear harmless at first, but this form of casual misogyny causes serious harm. It should be called out as epistemological violence, sustained by a mindset that routinely devalues women\u2019s knowledge and competence.<\/p>\n Women experience testimonial injustice in their everyday lives, as their words are often systematically disregarded simply because of who they are. What followed Captain Pathak\u2019s death goes a few steps further. It is not a matter of merely questioning a woman\u2019s testimony; she is being denied the right to testify at all. This is posthumous erasure. The technical complexities of the crash were quickly pushed aside. The gap was filled by snide jokes, sexist tropes, and familiar insinuations about women\u2019s competence. A skilled professional with years of experience was reduced to a caricature. Her decisions were mocked rather than being examined with the seriousness accorded to male pilots. In death, her career was rewritten through prejudice, as if gender is the only analytical lens available to explain a tragedy. What is at stake here is not merely respect for one woman but the persistent culture that finds it easier to blame women than to put a question mark on its own patriarchal attitude and misogyny.<\/p>\n When a woman enters a male-dominated profession, she carves a \u2018space of appearance<\/a><\/strong>\u2018 in the public realm where individuals appear as equals, and, through their very presence, these women challenge the entrenched hierarchies prevalent in society. Their presence is celebrated only to the extent of putting up a WhatsApp status described as women\u2019s empowerment. However, sooner or later, the same people begin to find faults in the same women who were earlier seen as harbingers of women\u2019s empowerment.\u00a0<\/p>\n The mockery that follows their deaths can be understood by extending Achille Mbembe\u2019s concept of necropolitics<\/a><\/strong> to gender, exposing how women\u2019s deaths in professional contexts become sites for reasserting male epistemic authority. The female pilot\u2019s death is used to argue that women don\u2019t belong in cockpits, suggesting their entry into these spaces was always premature and suspect. Each instance of mockery after a woman\u2019s professional failure or death makes it increasingly difficult for subsequent women to escape the gravitational pull of gendered expectations.\u00a0<\/p>\n In Pathak\u2019s death, her gender becomes inextricable from the analysis. This phenomenon reflects what Simone de Beauvoir<\/a><\/strong> identified as the fundamental problem of women\u2019s social position: being defined as the eternal \u2018Other\u2019 against which the male \u2018Self\u2019 establishes meaning. Men in aviation are individuals, while women are representatives of their sex. A male pilot\u2019s crash reflects on him alone, while a female pilot\u2019s crash reflects on all women. This asymmetry isn\u2019t natural but cultivated through continuous discursive reinforcement. This mockery operates through what Judith Butler identifies as \u201cPerformative violence\u201d,<\/a><\/strong> speech acts that don\u2019t merely describe but simultaneously construct and enforce social hierarchies. Each comment mocking the driving skills of women does not simply reflect existing sexism, but it also produces and reinforces it.<\/p>\n The way forward requires more than grief or outrage. The need of the hour is a thorough examination of how professional spaces are still constructed as masculine, how women\u2019s failures are seen as complete failures of womanhood, and how even death cannot protect women from being subjected to gendered judgment that men escape. Until we break down the epistemological and discursive structures that allow such mockery, we continue to inflict all women who strive to occupy spaces they have been historically denied.<\/p>\n The young pilot who died in Baramati deserves justice, one that begins with outright refusal of gendered logic that transforms her death into an occasion for misogyny\u2019s reproduction.<\/p>\nWhen Gender Becomes the Only Lens: Epistemological Violence in Action<\/strong><\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/feminisminindia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/WhatsApp-Image-2026-02-03-at-3.19.44-PM-844x1024.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\nPosthumous Erasure: Denying Women the Right to Testify<\/strong><\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/feminisminindia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/WhatsApp-Image-2026-02-03-at-3.21.44-PM.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\nThe Eternal \u2018Other\u2019:\u00a0 How Women\u2019s Deaths Reinforce Male Authority<\/strong><\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/feminisminindia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/WhatsApp-Image-2026-02-03-at-3.18.54-PM.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/feminisminindia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/WhatsApp-Image-2026-02-03-at-3.19.28-PM.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\nBreaking the Cycle: Moving Beyond Outrage<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
![\"Gunjan](\"https:\/\/feminisminindia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PHOTO-2026-01-15-18-20-01-100x100.jpg\")
<\/a><\/div>\n