![\"'26%](\"https:\/\/static.toiimg.com\/thumb\/msid-128645774,imgsize-72152,width-400,resizemode-4\/untitled-design.jpg\" "\\"Rahul")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nPuducherry, the Union territory nestled within Tamil Nadu, will head to the polls in April alongside the state. But a growing rift between the Congress and its ally, the DMK \u2014 which governs Tamil Nadu on its own despite their alliance \u2014 now threatens to spill into Puducherry just months before the crucial assembly elections.At the heart of the conflict is the Congress\u2019 demand for a share of power in Tamil Nadu if the DMK-led bloc wins again, along with a larger number of seats to contest than in 2021. Puducherry, given its geographical and cultural closeness to Tamil Nadu, is also emerging as a stage for this simmering rift. <\/p>\n Congress In Damage Control Mode After Mani Shankar Aiyar\u2019s Baton Remark To Kerala Chief Minister<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Manickam Tagore, a close confidant of former Congress president and current Lok Sabha leader of opposition, Rahul Gandhi, has been at the forefront of the party\u2019s push for greater \u201crespect\u201d from the DMK in Tamil Nadu. Now, he is extending that demand for \u201crespect\u201d in Puducherry as well.How practical is Tagore’s demand? Can he \u2014 or the Congress \u2014 compel the DMK to concede? How likely is it that the DMK would give in? And with elections approaching, can the alliance afford internal strains? Let\u2019s take a closer look.<\/p>\n The politics in Puducherry, a former French colony, has been dominated by the Congress. Three other parties have also formed governments here\u2014DMK, AIADMK, and the All India NR Congress\u2014but none have ever enjoyed the level of dominance that the Congress did.That dominance is evident in the numbers: of Puducherry\u2019s 10 chief ministers, seven have hailed from the Congress. <\/p>\n The UT’s lone Lok Sabha seat has also mirrored this political success. The constituency, also called Puducherry, has been contested in 15 general elections since 1967 and has been won by the grand old party \u2014 either directly or through its factions \u2014 11 times.This legacy perhaps explains why the Congress sees Puducherry as politically significant. Given its long-standing dominance and the stakes of a potential defeat, the Congress would be keen to reclaim its supremacy here.<\/p>\n <\/strong>Against the backdrop of political tensions in Tamil Nadu, the first signs of a possible spillover to Puducherry emerged on February 6. That day, Tagore posted on social media, citing electoral data to argue that the Congress \u2014 and not the DMK \u2014 should lead their alliance in Puducherry. <\/p>\n Manickam Tagore<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n \u201cWill the party with 8% of the votes lead the coalition? No, the party with 26% of the votes will lead. Why should the Congress party be talked down to in the coalition?\u201d he asked.Also Read | <\/span>‘26% votes vs 8% votes’: Cong MP Tagore targets ally DMK; seeks leadership role for Puducherry unit in poll-bound UT<\/a>The data he referred to was from the 2014 general elections. He did not explain why he chose figures from more than a decade ago, particularly from a parliamentary election rather than an assembly contest. In that election, the Congress finished second in the Puducherry Lok Sabha constituency, while the DMK came fourth. The Congress candidate, V Narayanasamy, who became chief minister two years later and held the post for over four years, secured 26.35% of the vote, whereas DMK\u2019s AMH Nazeem received 8.19% and came fourth.A visit to Puducherry by the DMK\u2019s election in-charge and Lok Sabha MP, S Jagathrakshakan, appears to have triggered the current episode. During the trip, he did not meet Congress leaders, and this \u201csnub,\u201d coupled with the ongoing friction in Tamil Nadu, seems to have sparked Tagore’s outburst.But beyond the immediate provocation, the larger question is whether his assertion is merely rhetorical posturing or grounded in electoral reality.<\/p>\n Despite Tagore\u2019s assertive stance, the ground reality appears far less encouraging – if not outright alarming -for the Congress in Puducherry, where it was once the dominant political force. While the DMK remains the undisputed leader of the alliance in Tamil Nadu, the Congress now finds itself on comparatively weaker footing in Puducherry. Although it won the Puducherry seat in the two most recent general elections, its performance in the 2021 assembly polls was far less impressive. The Congress secured just two of the 14 seats it contested \u2014 a steep drop from the 15 it had won out of 21 during a successful campaign five years earlier. In contrast, the DMK, which contested 13 assembly constituencies under the seat-sharing arrangement, won six of them \u2014 securing the post of the leader of opposition in the assembly. The DMK, which is currently headed by Tamil Nadu CM MK Stalin, had managed just two of the nine seats it contested in 2016. Tagore\u2019s remarks could, therefore, be read either as election-season posturing or as a calculated attempt to pressure the DMK \u2014 in Puducherry or even in Tamil Nadu.<\/p>\n The DMK remains a significant political player in Puducherry, while the Congress has been largely marginal in Tamil Nadu \u2014 last heading a government there in 1967 and last holding the leader of opposition post in 1996.The Dravidian major\u2019s categorical refusal to share power in the southern state \u2014 a stance reiterated by Stalin himself \u2014 presents a major challenge for the Congress, leaving it to try and assert itself in Puducherry, where its historical influence still exists and where the party held power as recently as 2021.<\/p>\n We also know that it (power-sharing) will not work in Tamil Nadu. It is a problem created by some people. They are deliberately conspiring to see if there will be a rift in the alliance.<\/p>\n MK Stalin However, the Congress\u2019 leverage \u2014 or lack thereof \u2014 in Tamil Nadu is already evident. The state Congress unit has urged the party\u2019s national president, Mallikarjun Kharge, to take action against Tagore for his criticisms of the DMK, which itself has also called for action against the Virudhunagar MP.Also Read | <\/span>TN Cong seeks action against party MP Manickam Tagore for putting DMK ties under ‘strain’<\/a>Whether the DMK exercises this leverage in Puducherry too or concedes ground to the Congress to maintain alliance cohesion ahead of the elections would shape not only the immediate electoral battle with the UT\u2019s ruling NDA coalition, but also the longer-term balance of power between the two allies.<\/p>\n With much at stake, the Congress can hardly risk tensions in Puducherry, especially on the eve of elections. With governments in only three states \u2014 Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, and Telangana \u2014 the Congress can ill afford fresh tensions within the alliance. A victory in Puducherry would provide a much-needed additional governing foothold and strengthen its hand within INDIA, the national opposition bloc it leads. Tensions within the opposition coalition have been simmering after a series of electoral setbacks following the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, in which they succeeded in reducing the BJP below the majority mark for the first time since 2014.For now, the Congress appears to be adopting a wait-and-watch approach. Whether this strategy bolsters its position or strains a key alliance ahead of the elections will soon be revealed.<\/div>\n\nCongress: A giant of Puducherry politics<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
\n
Manickam Tagore’s ‘26% vs 8%’ salvo<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
![\"Manickam](\"https:\/\/static.toiimg.com\/photo\/imgsize-23456,msid-128648810\/manickam-tagore.jpg\" "\\"Manickam")
<\/p>\nCongress in Puducherry: Historically dominant – not so much today?<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Leverage-less Congress?<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Why Congress can\u2019t afford friction in Puducherry<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n